Monday, July 6, 2015

Exhausted...

Image result for Hanna Bouveng

A young Swedish woman who sued her former Wall Street executive boss over lurid allegations of sexual conquest, betrayal and stalking was awarded $18 million by a federal jury.

Hanna Bouveng, 25, accused Benjamin Wey, a Chinese-born American Wall Street financier, and CEO of New York Global Group, in an $850 million lawsuit of using his power as owner of the Group to coerce her into four sexual encounters before firing her after discovering she had a boyfriend.

Bouveng, who was raised in Sweden, testified that soon after Wey hired her, the CEO began a relentless quest to have sex with her. She says he fired her six months later after she refused any more sexual contact and he found a man in her bed in the apartment he helped finance.

Wey, 43, also sought to defame Bouveng by posting articles on his blog accusing her of being a "street walker," a "loose woman" and an extortionist, her lawyers say.

Wey walked into a Stockholm cafe in April 2014 where she was working a few months after she was fired from Global Group, her attorney told jurors. "The message was: 'Wherever you are, whatever you are doing, I am going to find you and I am going to get you," Ratner said.

The married financier denied ever having sex with Bouveng. He portrayed her as an opportunist. Wey testified that Bouveng knew nothing about finance before he hired and began mentoring her. She betrayed his generosity by embracing a party-girl lifestyle that left her too exhausted to succeed.  Apparently she did... Just a thought.

Driven Part 4-Pao Pao

Kate Ford

Controversy over Pao's handling of the firing of a popular Reddit administrator continued to grow, as the uproar prompted several discussion boards to be taken offline, while the CEO lost more support among Reddit's users.

According to the Change.org petition, Pao is responsible for "a new age of censorship" on the website. The petition began three weeks ago after five forums (known as subreddits) on the site were banned for breaking Reddit's anti-harassment policy.

The appointment of Pao, the plaintiff in a high profile Silicon Valley discrimination lawsuit recently, was polarizing from the start. Some users were concerned that she would censor certain of the site's more freewheeling communities. Reddit's recent clampdown on a number of offensive subreddits led some users to deride her as "Chairman Pao."

"A vast majority of the Reddit community believes that Pao, "a manipulative individual who will sue her way to the top," has overstepped her boundaries and fears that she will run Reddit into the ground" the petition says.

At the same time, over 100 of Reddit's most popular forums have been set to "private," locking them off, by their moderators in protest against the company's decision to dismiss Director of Talent Victoria Taylor.

In a Friday interview with Time Magazine, Pao apologized for the abruptness of Taylor's firing, saying the company didn't handle the transition well, although she declined to comment on the reasons behind Taylor's dismissal.

The moderators (unpaid, voluntary web users who help to run the subreddits) relied on Taylor to help arrange Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions, a highly popular feature where members of the public or celebrities could answer questions from Reddit users.

Taylor's dismissal is not the only reason moderators are unsatisfied. "There is a feeling among many of the moderators of reddit that the admins do not respect the work that is put in by the thousands of unpaid volunteers who maintain the communities of the 9,656 active subreddits," Gilgamesh added.

An online petition calling for Ellen Pao to step down, signed by over 100,000 people who are deeply critical of her leadership.

Just a thought. 

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Who Done This?







Who is burning churches in the USA? Does this have any thing to do with the Supreme Court Gay rights decision?     Just a thought.

Monday, June 29, 2015

No Sweat.


"There cannot be any cleaner situation than this one," said Maria Haberfeld, head of the law and police science department at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. "You cannot shoot any fleeing felon, but certainly you can shoot the one who poses a real threat. There was no reason to believe this person who had killed a police officer before was not posing a real threat."

The same legal reasoning applied to the killing of his accomplice, Richard Matt, who was shot three times in the head.

Sweat eluded capture for two more days, until he ran across Sgt. Jay Cook. Sweat had been serving life without parole in the killing of a sheriff's deputy, by shooting him twenty two times. Matt had been serving 25 years to life for the killing of his former boss.

Cook was alone in his car when he spotted someone walking along the side of a road less than 2 miles from the Canadian border. He got out of his car, approached the man and said, "Hey, come over here. Sweat fled, and Cook chased him, firing twice.

A 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case known as Tennessee v. Garner laid out how force can be used to capture a fleeing suspect: Deadly force can't be used to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

New York state law also allows for deadly force if a dangerous convict is escaping from a detention facility, which is why armed guards may be stationed in towers at prisons.

Now, all can go back to their regular life, No Sweat.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Grace... Amazing Grace

 

With a rousing eulogy and a chorus of "Amazing Grace," President Barack Obama called on the country Friday to honor the nine victims of the South Carolina church massacre by working toward racial healing.

He said that includes removing the Confederate flag from the State House grounds, which he said would be not an act of political correctness but a "meaningful balm" for the unhealed wounds of slavery and the Jim Crow era.
Here it is
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102792347

Roe.. Roe

Pro Life

Roe v. Wade, (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy


The Supreme Court ruled that President Obama’s health care law allows the federal government to provide nationwide tax subsidies to help poor and middle-class people buy health insurance, a sweeping vindication that endorsed the larger purpose of Mr. Obama’s signature legislative achievement.
The 6-to-3 ruling means that it is all but certain that the Affordable Care Act will survive after Mr. Obama leaves office in 2017. For the second time in three years, the law survived an encounter with the Supreme Court. But the court’s tone was different this time. The first decision, in 2012, was fractured and grudging, while Thursday’s ruling was more assertive.
Republicans now saying Repeal and replace. Will appoint conservative judges to make sure that these two decision reversed.                                                               
We will be talking about that for the next fourty years, but not able to change it. . .   Just a thought.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Medications' prices



health canada drug

Two U.S. Senators have re-introduced legislation that would allow Americans to purchase medicines from Canada. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and John McCain (R-Az.) have advocated the Safe and Affordable Drugs from Canada Act.

The bill would permit Americans, who must have a valid prescription from a physician licensed in the U.S., to order up to a 90-day supply of medicines from a licensed Canadian pharmacy. Prescription drugs would have to have the same active ingredients, dosage form, and potency as medicines that are approved by the FDA.

Whether the legislation will progress is uncertain. The bill introduced last year went nowhere, despite bi-partisan sponsorship. Nonetheless, the effort may gain some attention at a time when prices for medicines from the latest cancer treatments to some older generic salves are rising at a rapid pace. The cost of new hepatitis C medicines, for instance, prompted a Congressional hearing last year.

The cheaper alternatives [in Canada] come with the same safety standards and are the same dosages sold in the U.S, but currently law prevents Americans from importing them and benefiting from the savings,”  Klobuchar says in a statement. “That just doesn’t make sense.”

Maine began allowing its residents to purchase prescription drugs from some pharmacies in the U.K., Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The first-in-the-nation law garnered support from the business community, but has come under attack by the pharmaceutical industry.

Drug makers have argued.....   filed lawsuit in hopes of overturning the state law. 
Canadian pharmacy may not resell drugs from online pharmacies located outside Canada to the U.S. 

Klobuchar  was one of several senators to introduce legislation to allow Medicare to negotiate prices with drug makers and last year she co-sponsored a bill that would restrict patent settlements between drug makers that can delay the introduction of lower-cost generic drugs.

Prices of medications in Canada is 30% the prices in USA.  Passing this law will even the prices in both countries.
Just a thought.

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Greece

Greece - European Union. Elcano Blog


The Greek government may think it has given significant ground in its latest proposal but the creditors appear to be saying think again. The mood goes from bad to good and back again. In terms of absolute numbers, the distance between the two sides isn't huge. But the political gulf is significant.

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras is caught between a rock and a hard place - between the promises he made back home, and the commitments the creditors insist he must respect.
 
But these negotiations aren't just about budget targets. The Greeks are also demanding that there has to be serious discussion of debt restructuring. On that issue there is more sympathy from the IMF. But there is less from the European Central Bank and several Eurozone countries.

Beyond finances, the outcome of those negotiations will have lasting ramifications for European unity and security, raising profound questions about Ms. Merkel’s leadership and about her legacy as a primary driver of five years of austerity policies that Greeks blame for pushing them to a precipice.
 
Some financial experts say that Europe could absorb a Greek exit from the Eurozone, despite the many questions that departure would raise for creditor nations forced to write off hundreds of billions of euros.
 
If they stay or go, they will pay for their own affair, no one else.
  Just a thought.

Nonchalant....

cellular indifference by michref

Thursday, June 18, 2015