The Conventional Wisdom Is Wrong. Libya's 2011 uprising was never peaceful, but instead was armed and violent from the start. Muammar al-Qaddafi did not target civilians or resort to indiscriminate force. Although inspired by humanitarian impulse, NATO's intervention did not aim mainly to protect civilians, but rather to overthrow Qaddafi's regime, even at the expense of increasing the harm to Libyans.
NATO's action magnified the conflict's duration about sixfold and its death toll at least sevenfold, while also exacerbating human rights abuses, humanitarian suffering, Islamic radicalism, and weapons proliferation in Libya and its neighbors. If Libya was a "model intervention," then it was a model of failure.
Three Lessons to learn from this intervention.
First, beware rebel propaganda that seeks intervention by falsely crying genocide.
Second, avoid intervening on humanitarian grounds in ways that reward rebels and thus endanger civilians, unless the state is already targeting noncombatants.
Third, resist the tendency of humanitarian intervention to morph into regime change, which amplifies the risk to civilians.
First, beware rebel propaganda that seeks intervention by falsely crying genocide.
Second, avoid intervening on humanitarian grounds in ways that reward rebels and thus endanger civilians, unless the state is already targeting noncombatants.
Third, resist the tendency of humanitarian intervention to morph into regime change, which amplifies the risk to civilians.
No comments:
Post a Comment