There is a growing body of evidence that sanctions can impose severe humanitarian costs on innocent civilian populations. Studies show that sanctions have wreaked significant harm in Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and Syria, leading to adverse health impacts like malnutrition and increased infant mortality.
Targeted sanctions, such as those imposed on human rights offenders under the Global Magnitsky Act, more easily avoid such collateral damage. But comprehensive sanctions programs—those that target entire countries or governments—can be devastating; some have labeled them “financial carpet bombing.” By one estimate, there have been tens of thousands of deaths due to sanctions.
The U.S. government often grants licenses to enable the provision of humanitarian aid to areas affected by sanctions. But these licenses can be narrow in their conception of humanitarian assistance for instance, by not including civilian energy infrastructure and delayed in implementation.
Moreover, because the penalties for violating sanctions are so immense, the private sector routinely “over-complies” with sanctions and shies away from transacting with targets even when a license is granted.
A recent U.S. Government Accountability Office report on Venezuela sanctions found that all nine of the U.S. Agency for International Development implementing partners in that country had banks close their accounts or reject transactions, despite being permitted to deliver humanitarian aid.
So we crush a country, and gave a little leftover to the few. Just a "famine" thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment