Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Earings...

Image result for beautiful eyes
She suddenly becomes as frosty as an orange slush and you have no idea what  arouse her wrath.
She is angry and she wants you to figure it out.
When she refuses to communicate with you, chances are that whatever you did isn't all that serious. Perhaps, you didn't notice her new earrings.
Give her the space she needs to cool down.
When she feels ready to talk again she will approach you, glare at you with those big beautiful eyes, make huffing sounds that would make her look all the more desirable or you just had enough. Move on. Just a thought.

Maybe...

Obvious Games Women Play With Men

For most women, a courtship or a relationship is often about testing the man they are with.  And these tests are almost always done with the intention of being in control of the relationship.
The typical guy is usually clueless about the games women play.
You like this particular girl, who refuses to neither move in nor move back. She sends all the right signals, but when you try and respond to them she just pulls back.

This isn't always just a matter of her trying to present herself as a challenge. Most women are wary of getting into a relationship if there is an emotional risk involved. So she might be just testing the waters to make sure that you're worth the risk. And testing the waters can take years.
If she's not clear about her feelings for you but is giving you the "I'm interested" signals, then show her you feel the same way. But don't overdo it, as you still want to remain a challenge. Just let her understand that there are  more fish in the sea, and alot more grapes in the bunch so you can easily look elsewhere if things don't seem to work out.  She may have been doing the same, looking elsewhere.

Divorce...

Image result for women scorned cartoon
If all else failed, a divorce lawyer may be the direction.

Hate all...

Image result for women scorned cartoon

Outraged...

The cartoonist's homepage, clarionledger.com/opinion

Booker...

Image result for professional protestor cartoon

Hire...

Image result for professional protestor cartoon

Loss...

Image result for horse face
A California judge ordered Stormy Daniels' lawyer Michael Avenatti to pay $4.85 million to an attorney at his former law firm, the first time the potential presidential candidate is being held personally liable in the case.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Dennis Landin  said Avenatti must pay the money because he personally guaranteed a settlement with Jason Frank. Frank had alleged the firm misstated its profits and that he was owed millions.
The ruling follows a court ruling from a U.S. bankruptcy court judge who ordered Avenatti's former firm to pay $10 million to Frank in May. The $4.85 million is in addition.
In July, the Justice Department accused Avenatti of making misrepresentations in the bankruptcy case and said his former law firm owed more than $440,000 in unpaid federal taxes.
A federal judge dismissed Daniels' defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump.

Say Something...

Central American migrants, part of a caravan trying to reach the U.S., cross the Suchiate River to avoid the border checkpoint in Ciudad Hidalgo, Mexico, October 20, 2018.
What is Sen. Shumer saying regarding the thousands marching to US border? No opinion? Not even "Abolish ICE"? Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Elizabeth Warren, Booker, any one?

Monday, October 22, 2018

Paid...

Internet trolls widely shared a photograph of demonstrator Vickie Lampron being handed cash by an organizer while she waited to enter the U.S. Capitol, where she would be one of the first persons to be arrested protesting at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for Kavanaugh on 4 September 2018. Conspiracy theorists claimed a photograph of her was evidence that protesters were paid for personal gain in exchange for disrupting the hearings.
The picture was originally posted by Adam Schindler to his website and to Twitter. He also made a YouTube video.
The first image was also widely shared on Facebook with the following caption: “This woman disrupted the Kavanaugh hearing held on September 4 and was thrown out. 

Disrupting the proceedings is an imoral act and compared only to what misguided people do based on hate. Express your opinion legally.